<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' xmlns:georss='http://www.georss.org/georss' xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16635486</id><updated>2011-04-21T19:36:05.373-07:00</updated><title type='text'>BallotBrain™</title><subtitle type='html'>&lt;a href="http://www.ballotbrain.com/"&gt;www.ballotbrain.com™ election information&lt;/a&gt;.  Commentary and news on &lt;a href="http://www.ballotbrain.com/ca/2005/"&gt;California's 2005 Special Election&lt;/a&gt;</subtitle><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://blog.ballotbrain.com/feeds/posts/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/16635486/posts/default'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://blog.ballotbrain.com/'/><link rel='hub' href='http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/'/><author><name>Steve</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09533650990356833299</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>12</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16635486.post-4903443597565221705</id><published>2010-03-07T15:12:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2010-03-07T18:26:16.103-08:00</updated><title type='text'>This blog has moved</title><summary type='text'>
       This blog is now located at http://blog.ballotbrain.com/.
       You will be automatically redirected in 30 seconds, or you may click here.

       For feed subscribers, please update your feed subscriptions to
       http://www.ballotbrain.com/blog/atom.xml.
  </summary><link rel='related' href='http://blog.ballotbrain.com/' title='This blog has moved'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/16635486/posts/default/4903443597565221705'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/16635486/posts/default/4903443597565221705'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://blog.ballotbrain.com/2010/03/this-blog-has-moved.html' title='This blog has moved'/><author><name>Steve</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09533650990356833299</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16635486.post-114245435952279571</id><published>2006-03-15T12:18:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2006-03-15T12:26:55.580-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Reiner's Slight of Hand</title><summary type='text'>Kurt over at Fly at Night brings us up to date on Reiner's latest remarks and what's not happening with the state audit.</summary><link rel='related' href='http://www.flyatnight.com/?p=170' title='Reiner&apos;s Slight of Hand'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/16635486/posts/default/114245435952279571'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/16635486/posts/default/114245435952279571'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://blog.ballotbrain.com/2006/03/reiners-slight-of-hand.html' title='Reiner&apos;s Slight of Hand'/><author><name>Steve</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09533650990356833299</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16635486.post-114245112520848989</id><published>2006-03-15T11:27:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2006-03-15T11:38:24.386-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Grass-Roots Libertarians Oppose Meathead's Prop. 82</title><summary type='text'>Measure would destroy preschools already serving two-thirds of eligible children
LOS ANGELES ? The Libertarian Party of California (LPC) adopted a resolution at its state convention this weekend opposing Proposition 82, the "California Preschool for All Act," and urges all Californians to vote against the measure. The resolution condemning Prop. 82 was passed unanimously. The delegates who voted </summary><link rel='related' href='http://ca.lp.org/pr20060302.shtml' title='Grass-Roots Libertarians Oppose Meathead&apos;s Prop. 82'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/16635486/posts/default/114245112520848989'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/16635486/posts/default/114245112520848989'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://blog.ballotbrain.com/2006/03/grass-roots-libertarians-oppose.html' title='Grass-Roots Libertarians Oppose Meathead&apos;s Prop. 82'/><author><name>Steve</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09533650990356833299</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16635486.post-114083597274740783</id><published>2006-02-24T18:43:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2006-02-24T18:52:52.756-08:00</updated><title type='text'>California June Primary Election</title><summary type='text'>After a 3 month break from posting, I'm back to comment on the 2006 California Primary Election on June 6, 2006.  I have a prelimary page up, and will be adding more.  I will be covering the two propositions, prop 81 and prop 82, as well as the statewide primary races that will be on the ballot.</summary><link rel='related' href='http://www.ballotbrain.com/ca/2006primary/' title='California June Primary Election'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/16635486/posts/default/114083597274740783'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/16635486/posts/default/114083597274740783'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://blog.ballotbrain.com/2006/02/california-june-primary-election.html' title='California June Primary Election'/><author><name>Steve</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09533650990356833299</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16635486.post-114079265060102618</id><published>2006-02-24T06:15:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2006-02-24T06:52:57.463-08:00</updated><title type='text'>The Reiner rip-off</title><summary type='text'>The Union Tribune remarks on new published reports that:
The First 5 panel paid $206,000 to three political consultants to run the commission TV ad campaign. After Reiner's initiative qualified for the ballot, the TV ad campaign stopped ? with a final tab of $23 million ? and the consultants went to work for the campaign touting the initiative.This reeks. Of course there was a tight coordination </summary><link rel='related' href='http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/op-ed/editorial1/20060223-9999-lz1ed23top.html' title='The Reiner rip-off'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/16635486/posts/default/114079265060102618'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/16635486/posts/default/114079265060102618'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://blog.ballotbrain.com/2006/02/reiner-rip-off.html' title='The Reiner rip-off'/><author><name>Steve</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09533650990356833299</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16635486.post-113097111588735468</id><published>2005-11-02T14:31:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2005-11-03T14:07:13.826-08:00</updated><title type='text'>I Got Elected. You May Not Criticize Me.</title><summary type='text'>While not directly related to the California Special Election, John Stossel comments here on the McCain-Feingold Incumbent Protection Act.
"I got elected. You may not criticize me."OK, the incumbents don't put it that way. They say: "There's too much money in politics! We need campaign finance reform."And they get it. "Reform" sounds good. McCain-Feingold and a host of state laws would protect us</summary><link rel='related' href='http://www.realclearpolitics.com/Commentary/com-11_2_05_JS.html' title='I Got Elected. You May Not Criticize Me.'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/16635486/posts/default/113097111588735468'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/16635486/posts/default/113097111588735468'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://blog.ballotbrain.com/2005/11/i-got-elected-you-may-not-criticize-me.html' title='I Got Elected. You May Not Criticize Me.'/><author><name>Steve</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09533650990356833299</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16635486.post-113004381198773792</id><published>2005-10-22T20:27:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-10-22T22:03:31.993-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Tom Cambell Q&amp;A on prop 76</title><summary type='text'>State Finance Director Tom Cambell answers some questions about prop 76 on the JoinArnold.com website.  Click here to read.</summary><link rel='related' href='http://tinyurl.com/dweu8' title='Tom Cambell Q&amp;A on prop 76'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/16635486/posts/default/113004381198773792'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/16635486/posts/default/113004381198773792'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://blog.ballotbrain.com/2005/10/tom-cambell-qa-on-prop-76.html' title='Tom Cambell Q&amp;A on prop 76'/><author><name>Steve</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09533650990356833299</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16635486.post-112967725746904765</id><published>2005-10-18T16:11:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-10-18T16:59:16.506-07:00</updated><title type='text'>The Perils of Prop 79</title><summary type='text'>the CoyoteBlog has a great article on the Perils of Prop 79.
It turns out that the initiative contains a little-noticed provision that will allow private trial lawyers to sue drug companies for the new tort of "profiteering in prescription drugs."</summary><link rel='related' href='http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2005/10/the_perils_of_p.html' title='The Perils of Prop 79'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/16635486/posts/default/112967725746904765'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/16635486/posts/default/112967725746904765'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://blog.ballotbrain.com/2005/10/perils-of-prop-79.html' title='The Perils of Prop 79'/><author><name>Steve</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09533650990356833299</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16635486.post-112922297944738343</id><published>2005-10-13T09:55:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-10-13T10:02:59.453-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Chronicle reports Yes on 76 argument</title><summary type='text'>California Director of Finance, Tom Campbell, reports why we need reform of the state's automatic spending formulaes that keep propelling spending above revenue.  Even when we spend more than last year, the states employees unions call it a cut because the broken spending formulas say we should have spent even more.</summary><link rel='related' href='http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2005/10/13/EDGEAF78F91.DTL' title='Chronicle reports Yes on 76 argument'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/16635486/posts/default/112922297944738343'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/16635486/posts/default/112922297944738343'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://blog.ballotbrain.com/2005/10/chronicle-reports-yes-on-76-argument.html' title='Chronicle reports Yes on 76 argument'/><author><name>Steve</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09533650990356833299</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16635486.post-112693429889887383</id><published>2005-09-16T22:13:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-09-16T22:27:22.060-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Governor's Measures ahead in New Poll</title><summary type='text'>New Poll shows a majority of California Voters Support Proposition 74, 76 &amp; 77.

A recent private poll, conducted by Governor Schwarzenegger's pollster McLaughlin &amp; Associates, shows strong support for the Governor's reform agenda, which will appear on the November Special Election ballot.</summary><link rel='related' href='http://tinyurl.com/7b5mp' title='Governor&apos;s Measures ahead in New Poll'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/16635486/posts/default/112693429889887383'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/16635486/posts/default/112693429889887383'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://blog.ballotbrain.com/2005/09/governors-measures-ahead-in-new-poll.html' title='Governor&apos;s Measures ahead in New Poll'/><author><name>Steve</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09533650990356833299</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16635486.post-112672152133803778</id><published>2005-09-14T11:02:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-09-17T22:53:53.080-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Good Article on Prop 76</title><summary type='text'>The San Diego Union-Tribune has a great article "Governor has a crucial ally in Prop. 76 push" on Prop 76.
The long-anticipated union campaign against Arnold Schwarzenegger's special election initiatives has kicked into gear in recent days with a gut punch of a TV ad campaign depicting the governor as the reckless enemy of cops, school kids, teachers, decency, the American way – you name it.

The</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/16635486/posts/default/112672152133803778'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/16635486/posts/default/112672152133803778'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://blog.ballotbrain.com/2005/09/good-article-on-prop-76.html' title='Good Article on Prop 76'/><author><name>Steve</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09533650990356833299</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16635486.post-112650959260477992</id><published>2005-09-12T00:15:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-09-13T09:51:57.813-07:00</updated><title type='text'>New Blog for BallotBrain.com</title><summary type='text'>I've decided to try and create a new blog to discuss issues pertaining to California'a 2005 special election.</summary><link rel='related' href='http://www.ballotbrain.com/' title='New Blog for BallotBrain.com'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/16635486/posts/default/112650959260477992'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/16635486/posts/default/112650959260477992'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://blog.ballotbrain.com/2005/09/new-blog-for-ballotbraincom.html' title='New Blog for BallotBrain.com'/><author><name>Steve</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09533650990356833299</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry></feed>
